Found this site called darwinsfinance.com while searching the web for  pro and con arguments for the current health care bill. Though his  primary focus is finance, he wrote an excellent article "What's wrong  With THIS Health Care Reform."
Darwin's not a fan, and makes some  disturbing points about "to ration or not to ration" (6 kidneys, 10  transplant patients, who decides???).  He takes big exception to some shameful back-room  deals made to get this legislation, like the deal made with  unions--grrr.
Yeah, it's a little ugly.  But don't lose the main point for a bitter sidebar.  Yeah, making side deals sucks, but always had  'em, probably always will... what about what we achieved?
Truthfully, after reading up a bit, I see a lot wrong  with this bill.  However, I've taken the viewpoint that suck or not, we  had to get SOMETHING on paper, or we would never even BEGIN to address  this heinous problem everyone agrees will bankrupt the country some day.    Are you forgetting that since Nixon, we have been trying to "fix" health  care with no luck?  Even back in '71, they could see the train wreck  coming.
It's a good thing we can agree it will bankrupt the  country if we do nothing--because from that point on, there is no  agreement.  So how do we move forward?  Better off trying to fix a  program in place, than to get one off the ground.
For good measure,  Darwin references several pro and con blogs: My Journey to Millions (gist: is this constitutional?), Len Penzo (gist: we'll have buyers  remorse) and Financial Samurai  (gist: insuring the uninsured is worth it).  It is worth reading all  three to get some other viewpoints; you may find that each of them makes  good points, or contains at least a little emotional argument,  incomplete logic or questionable "facts."  There may be legitimate  concern on how the insurance companies will fight back.  There will almost certainly be unintended consequences.  If you want a  really depressing viewpoint, do a search on "what nurses say about  Health care reform."   Man, who to believe...
Lest we forget, we are already sharing the costs of basic health  care for all in the form of Emergency Room's that can't (and rightly  shouldn't) turn away patients.  So, Mr. and Mrs. Entitlement, quit  bitching about footing the bill.  And get better informed about what you  stand to lose by this legislation, which in most cases is little or  nothing. 
GOP got you riled up?  Guess why, they aren't in power; and elections  are at stake this year. How are we going to pay for this?  Is it really  going to "save" us money in the long run?  I personally find much of  what the Dems do is distasteful, I am in fact a registered Republican.   But it is worth mentioning that a GOP controlled congress and GOP  president didn't even try to address health care.  Nor did they reduce  the federal budget, deficit, or the size of government.  Does it bother you that not one Republican reached across the aisle in an effort to get something passed, for the greater good?  It bothers me.  Some things really should transcend partisanship.
It's interesting to see the demographic that comprises the organized  protests... all I'm saying is do some research, listen to both sides,  and check your facts people.  You may still disagree with what's  happened but at least you won't be parrots or sheep.
I hope this damn post makes sense...
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment